Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Andrew Martin

Pages: [1]
1
Site Information / Re: Photo screening decisions, opinions please.
« on: November 02, 2010, 08:51:24 pm »
The problem with Kodachrome is that the emulsion is quite sticky compared to others like Fujichrome and as a result it tends to be quite a job removing dust and dirt particles that have accumulated on the slide over the years. One solution is to use software to eliminate these dust particles, ICE apparently does a pretty good job but it isn't clever enough to discriminate between what is and what isn't dust. It would appear that the picture I linked to used some kind of automatic dust removal but also removed other fine detail in the process.
As Frank has already pointed out he wasn't aware of the issue having never scanned a slide. When I started to look into the whole process of scanning slides I learnt quite a bit along the way. I started using a Canonscan 4400 flatbed scanner which used an insert to mount the slides, four at a time, into the lid. This gave reasonable results and a couple of images using this method are on this site. I wasn't entirely happy with the results so I then tried to shoot the slides on a lightbox using a macro lens attached to my Canon 40D. This too gave reasonable but inconsistent results. I then bought a Nikon Coolscan slide scanner and I wish I went with this option from the outset! It gives consistently good results and although the scan takes about 30-40 seconds it is by far the best method for scanning slides at home. For dust removal I normally increase the size of the scanned image to 20000 pixels in Photoshop and use the Healing Brush tool to remove any dust or imperfections. When I'm happy with that then I edit the image as normal i.e. brightning, contrast, sharpening etc. and save the image as a copy.
It's a learning curve scanning old slides but it's very rewarding to see old images come to life on the PC!

Andrew

andrewmartin.fotopic.net

2
Site Information / Re: Photo screening decisions, opinions please.
« on: November 02, 2010, 12:13:35 am »
I think in those days that some of those shots were taken the only things that carried decals were model airplanes! But hey, you're totally right about maintaining a certain standard and after all, it's your site so you have ultimate say on what goes up or not as the case may be.

Just for the record my shot of the Korean Boeing 747SP that went up earlier was taken back in '98 when I was shooting Kodachrome K64. I scanned the slide using a Nikon Coolscan, did a bit of post production work in Photoshop but the clever stuff is the noise/grain reducing software that I use, Nik Dfine 2.0. I find that really cleans up an old slide nicely!

Cheers,
Andrew

3
Site Information / Re: Photo screening decisions, opinions please.
« on: November 01, 2010, 11:34:25 pm »
Hiyas,

The picture I linked of the Dan Air BAe 146 displays a known problem involving the use of Digital ICE software to remove 'dirt' from old slides during the scan. If the software identifies the letters of the registration or part of the logo as dirt it will remove it during the scan. This would appear to be the case in the example I linked to. There are a number of other shots by the same photographer that are similarly affected. Personally I feel that these images should be re-scanned with the dirt removal option switched off and any clean up done in Photoshop.
Like I said, I don't have the hump about having shots rejected, I uploaded my first shots here in quite some time today, I just happen to prefer the way I can arrange my photos in fotopic.net. I have a few shots on ABPic but haven't uploaded there in about a year and I have just one shot on airliners.net! I uploaded a couple to airliners on the weekend but they haven't been processed yet...
I think this is a great site with many amazing pictures that I'm thankful to be able to view any time I want and I appreciate the amount of time that goes in to maintaining it... just one suggestion... does every Ryanair Boeing 737-8AS delivery have to go up, each one looks just like the last one!  :airforce_wink:

4
Site Information / Re: Photo screening decisions, opinions please.
« on: November 01, 2010, 09:48:26 pm »
Hi Paul,

I have no problem with you disagreeing with me and I don't have the hump about having pictures rejected but what I do have an issue with is the inconsistency in determinig what constitutes a 'good' image. As an example, how does this pass the guidelines laid down regarding the quality of a shot...??
http://www.worldairpics.com/photo/1012247/L/British-Aerospace-BAe-146-100/G-BKMN/Dan-Air-DA--DAN/?&sid=4022394632&sp=1616
The registration has been altered as has the tail logo. So, how did this image get through when other perfectly good shots are rejected?
Personally, I prefer having my own site and it was something I decided to do, not because I had shots rejected but because I get a greater deal of satisfaction arranging the galleries myself! And if you enjoyed some of my shots on this site you can see plenty more at my fotopic page.

Andrew

andrewmartin.fotopic.net

5
Site Information / Re: Photo screening decisions, opinions please.
« on: November 01, 2010, 07:38:02 pm »
I think the inconsistency of what passes for a good shot is what most users of the forum will find annoying. For example, I've had a few shots which I considered to be perfectly adequate rejected and then seen shots appear on this site of aircraft where the software used by the photographer has actually removed the airline titles and registration of the aircraft!
There is however, one very easy way to bypass this problem. I set up a fotopic page and I'm the arbiter of what appears on my pages and this works very well for me.
The page is at andrewmartin.fotopic.net if anyone is interested and the basic set up is free!  :airforce_cheesy:

6
UK Air Shows / Flying Legends & RIAT 2008
« on: July 07, 2008, 12:02:37 am »
Hiyas,

I'm flying out to Stansted from Dublin at 06:30 on Saturday morning, plan to do Duxford Saturday, then head to Fairford for Sunday flying back from Bristol at 22:10.
Anyone fancy a lift?


Andrew
ei3gsb@gmail.com

Pages: [1]