Author Topic: UAV's  (Read 1199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fouga

  • Guest
UAV's
« Reply #15 on: November 23, 2005, 12:44:27 pm »
Quote (sealion @ 22 Nov. 2005,14:02)
Hardly surprising, as it was taken at the Open day in the Naval base.

That post was for Hess not you Sealion.

Offline pilatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2005, 03:35:21 pm »
now that i actually think about it, it would be rather stupid using them as targets because if you hit them with one round they are gone!and at about roughly 600euro for one it would be a really dear way to practise!they might as well tow big kites behind a fast boat or a rib about 100meters behind and shoot that up instead!
above and beyond

Offline Hess

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #17 on: November 23, 2005, 09:07:51 pm »
Fouga, Its a wind up. Stand down. Just imagine if NS managed to down one! ie budget for next year gone!!!!!
"There is no reason why the poor and wayward should not experience the full effect of air power" - Hess 2005

Offline SousaTeuszii

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2005, 10:06:52 pm »
Hess,
We have agreed that it is an Irish Naval Officer at a Naval open day, therefore this is an official display. Can you therefore explain what they are used for?

Fouga

  • Guest
UAV's
« Reply #19 on: November 24, 2005, 11:39:09 am »
The INS Officer is behind the display also and from what everybody here has gathered Sealion dont do Spurious stuff! '<img'>

Offline pilatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #20 on: November 24, 2005, 04:34:07 pm »
ok wind up or not?come clean here people!
above and beyond

Offline RMR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
    • View Profile
    • NONE
UAV's
« Reply #21 on: November 24, 2005, 04:53:55 pm »
A bit more expensive than firing at a flare  '<img'>  '<img'>

Offline Hess

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #22 on: November 24, 2005, 06:05:42 pm »
Sousa Teuszii I have no idea what the NS use them for. Only that most forces around the world put up UAVs in the hope that thay will get them back, we are supposed to fire at ours with .5s!? I dont think so. A little common sense please
"There is no reason why the poor and wayward should not experience the full effect of air power" - Hess 2005

Offline sealion

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 456
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2005, 05:17:37 pm »
If I told you that out of the 4 originally purchased, only 2 are still flying, and one of those is slightly damaged, would you still think its a wind up?

Cost wise, its cheaper to write off a few hundred euro worth of toy helicopter, than have a drogue towing aircraft wait for ideal weather conditions to do pass after pass so the ships secondary gunners can take potshots at it.

And then there is the Clay Pigeons...

Offline SousaTeuszii

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2005, 06:33:21 pm »
Hess,
Most Navies and air forces in the world have traditionally used UAVs, called drones, with the express purpose of shooting the c**p out of them! Its only in recent years that drones and UAVs have been utilised in the Recce role and therefore are nice to have come home. Its interesting that you ask for common sense while purely discounting everybody elses ideas even though you have no idea what they are used for 'duh'

Offline RMR

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
    • View Profile
    • NONE
UAV's
« Reply #25 on: November 26, 2005, 07:37:29 am »
Now, clay pigeons i have seen...!!!  I did hear something about shooting at the little helis but i'm still skeptical...  '<img'>

Offline Hess

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
UAV's
« Reply #26 on: November 26, 2005, 05:02:25 pm »
Seagulls would be a more cost effective target for NS gunners than clay pigeones,and more ecological too!!! As for floating targets why not use the Hump-backed dolphin? 'pilot_laugh'
"There is no reason why the poor and wayward should not experience the full effect of air power" - Hess 2005