Savior from what exactly?
Four AB-139's are inbound. At least eight are required to provide a credible deployment package of 4-5. So take-up the option for two and add another option for two more to follow.
Or, look at a larger, more capable (and more expensive) Support Helo - such as NH 90, for the follow-on order. As well as cost though, the IAC would then have three different RW airframes to train on and to maintain. The 139 is far from ideal, but is a modern, capable Battlefield Support Helicopter perfectly able to operate in a deployed multi-national air group alongside say RAF Chinooks or Dutch Cougars - the most talked about EU Battle-Group partners - and is well suited for domestic tasks - occasional air ambulance, VIP & island support. Actually, the EC-135's should perform the majority of those missions and therefore a third 135 would be in order, with the intent of freeing up 139 time for tactical training and ops.
Pie in the sky and unaffordable? Preferable to taking on a third RW type, with limited capabilities that will become a maintenance and therefore an availability nightmare within a relatively few years. What the IAC needs now more than ever is consistent, reliable, credible, long term capability, and that won't come with second-hand, 60's vintage 212's. Remember, you get what you pay for.