If I may expand on my previous post - not only are the 139 crews not wearing helmets, but there is no evidence of eye protection or survival vests and LPU's (life preservers) - all of which are considered standard in contemporary military aviation operations - be it US, Brit, French, Canada, etc. Does the IAC have body armour for flight crews?
There is no such thing as an "admin flight" - and certainly range firing is not admin flying anyway. Even an aircraft doing pattern work at Baldonnel could be called upon to respond to an emergency and end up down in the mountains with weather closing in or ditched at sea. Train as you fight - or perhaps in the case Ireland, train as you plan to operate at least.
The IAC will deploy helicopters on nternational missions someday, no matter what some in government may say, and now is the time to develop the skills and the mindset for "operations", particularly given the 139's stated mission of support to SF.
These pix give the impression that the IAC lacks the professional focus of a serious military air arm. Unfortunate, since the IAC already has something of an international reputation as a none-too-serious flyng club - which is unfair and probably unfounded.
I know, I know...mountains out of mole hills.....
Cheers