Author Topic: Turboprops -  (Read 358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Silver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« on: January 13, 2004, 09:38:31 pm »
There is an interesting thread on the Key Aviation board regarding the future of turboprops in combat (or lack of same!).

It got me thinking about what combat roles the PC-9's could perform ?

Comments ?

Offline alpha foxtrot 07

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2004, 10:52:51 pm »
the main role would be ground attack, like the skyraider in vietnam, but the only problem is that jet engine equipped aircraft are less resistant to ground fire. one lucky shot and the plane goes down. the mustangs in WW11 had this problem with there liquid cooled engines. the reason for the big old radial on the A-1 was that a radial can take a lot of hits and still keep running. the A-10 is really the only true ground support/attack a/c out there. we all know the kind of protection built into that bird, our PC-9 would need this aswell or the 9 aircraft would last all of 3 days in a real fight.



you're not lost until you're lost at mach 3

Offline Silver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2004, 09:32:56 pm »
So basically the PC-9's would be suitable for COIN ops and interception of light aircraft and helis.

Actually,
How would the PC-9 go about interception of a light heli at night (lack of onboard radar) ?

Perhaps with the assistance of a CASA with it's FLIR and Radar ?

Offline alpha foxtrot 07

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2004, 09:15:50 am »
the old fassioned way, ground controlled radar intercept. fighters didn't always have radar ':p'
you're not lost until you're lost at mach 3

Offline tashkurgan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2004, 10:22:50 am »
GCI for helicopter intercepts? Hmmm.. not very likely, Eyeball Mk1 would probably be more efficient. Tooling around at 200knots trying to find a heli flying just above the ground at 90knots isn't easy. Just look at how difficult it was for US F-15C to intercept Serb Mi-8/17 in Kosovo and they had proper look down shoot down pulse doppler radar.

Offline alpha foxtrot 07

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2004, 06:36:38 am »
guess i didn't notice the heli part.
you're not lost until you're lost at mach 3

Offline Ben Dover

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Turboprops -
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2004, 01:25:28 pm »
Quote (Silver @ 13 Jan. 2004,12:38)
It got me thinking about what combat roles the PC-9's could perform ?

A Target for any half decent MG'er