« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Queenie  (Read 3732 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shamrock145

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #30 on: May 17, 2011, 08:35:22 pm »
"Charlie Jet 253"?! That might have created some confusion had a certain Casa been active in the area!

Was the aircraft escorted in? If so, where was it picked up and is there any footage or pictures?

...145
Logged

Offline thurian

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2011, 09:06:11 pm »
Quote from: Shamrock145 on May 17, 2011, 08:35:22 pm
"Charlie Jet 253"?! That might have created some confusion had a certain Casa been active in the area!

Was the aircraft escorted in? If so, where was it picked up and is there any footage or pictures?

...145

No escort (that I saw anyway), all on her lonesome. BTW, the irony of the reg was not lost on me either :stirthepot:
Logged

Offline Machlooper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2011, 09:19:21 pm »
There was a CASA out so I can only assume the 'jet' part was to differentiate.
 One guy said ge could hear jets above (an escort) but personally Id say it was stuff high coming out of EIDW, didn't sound throaty enough to be frontliners.
BTW: I believe Lady GaGa used the same aircraft only yesterday!!!
Logged

Offline Ascot 1960

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2011, 09:29:04 pm »
  One thinks there was a bit of top cover going on alright. Hens the slightly odd  c/s or maybe not? I did see it with the old mark one eye ball! for the last few miles ‘Jet 253’ was on its own! As ‘Thurian’ said. 'C-253 was out and about at the same time.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 09:34:26 pm by Ascot 1960 »
Logged

Offline Irish251

  • Premium Member
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 465
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2011, 10:57:38 pm »
The callsign was the usual one used by this operator, Cello Aviation.  It's "Cellojet", three-letter code CLJ.  The "253" was just coincidence, I'd say.  It's common enough for airctaft with similar callsigns to end up under the control of the same ATC unit and it's ATC's job to make sure no confusion occurs as regards instructions to each aircraft.
Logged

Offline Ascot 1960

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2011, 11:31:34 pm »
That makes sence. Right next is 'Marine 1 and 2' I take it ?
Logged

Offline Ascot 1960

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #36 on: May 20, 2011, 01:30:28 pm »
Last day! 'Cello 254' out of Bal 12.45 to Cork. Also out and about G-XXEB
Logged

Offline Machlooper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
    • View Profile
Re: Queenie
« Reply #37 on: May 20, 2011, 10:38:43 pm »
Quote
Right next is 'Marine 1 and 2' I take it ?

Yip, they pitched up today !!
Though not with those callsigns obviously!!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »